The Agentic SDLC: A CTO's Guide -

From SDLC to Agentic SDLC

I’ve lived through a lot of process evolutions. The move to agentic development is different in kind, not just degree. It’s changing what it means to lead an engineering organization altogether.

CTOs aren’t asking “should we use AI?” anymore. That debate is over. They’re asking: how do we rebuild our development process around it and how do I need to lead differently?

This article is my attempt to answer that.

What Traditional SDLC Was Built For

The Software Development Lifecycle: requirements, design, development, testing, deployment, feedback was architected around a fundamental constraint: humans are the only ones who can do the work.

That constraint shaped everything. Sequential handoffs existed because one person or team needed to finish before the next could start. Sprints existed to timebox human capacity and velocity. QA came after development because writing tests and writing code at the same time was too expensive. Code reviews were async because engineers couldn’t be in two places at once.

We built an entire system of process around human throughput limitations. And for decades, it worked.

What’s Changed

Agentic AI tools like Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and Devin are changing more than individual developer speed. They’re collapsing and reinventing the handoffs between stages entirely. Here’s what I’m seeing as a CTO and in the organizations we advise:

Requirements

What used to take weeks of grooming sessions is being drafted, refined, and structured by AI in hours. Engineers are parsing business goals and generating user stories directly but not waiting for a PM to hand off a spec. PMs who embrace this shift move from writing specs to shaping strategy, but those who don’t will find their role increasingly redundant.

Design & Architecture

What used to require a senior architect and days of whiteboarding can now produce multiple candidate architectures with trade-off analysis in a single session. The human job shifts from creating the design to evaluating and deciding between options.

Development

Developers are increasingly writing intent and describing what they want to build, while agents scaffold, implement, and iterate. The developer reviews, steers, and catches failure modes. They’re not gone from the process, but operating at a higher altitude. And frankly, I think that makes them more valuable, not less.

Testing

Testing is no longer a phase that happens after the code is written. Agents generate and run tests during development, flag regressions in real time, and maintain test coverage as the codebase evolves. The idea of a separate QA phase is becoming an artifact of the old model.

Deployment & Operations

Agents monitor, alert, and in some cases remediate without waking anyone up at 2am for a failure pattern. The human role shifts from routine incident response to designing the guardrails that determine when and how agents escalate.

What This Means for CTOs

The process implications are real, but the leadership implications are even bigger.

🏗️

Your org chart hasn’t caught up

The traditional split between engineers, PMs, and QA, or between engineers and architects, is eroding fast. If your team structure still reflects a handoff model, you’re adding coordination overhead that no longer serves a purpose. My prediction: Product, Engineering, and Design will ultimately converge into a single unified team.

🎯

The bottleneck has moved

In traditional SDLC, the bottleneck was development throughput and not enough engineers, not enough time. In agentic SDLC, the bottleneck is increasingly decision quality. Are we building the right thing? Is this architecture sound? The humans in the loop need to be excellent at judgment, not just execution.

⚠️

New failure modes require new oversight

Agents fail differently than humans and typically confidently, sometimes quietly, but at scale. They can produce code that looks right, passes tests, yet introduces errors or debt that surface weeks later.

🔲

“Done” is harder to define

In a world where an agent can keep iterating indefinitely, knowing when to stop and ship is a real skill. Scope discipline becomes critically important, not less.

📋

The governance question is unavoidable

What decisions can an agent make autonomously? What requires human approval? What gets logged and audited? Who is the engineer and responsible for the code in production? These aren’t theoretical questions but operational ones every engineering leader needs to answer before they can responsibly scale agentic workflows.

“Ever received a PR from your CEO who’s decided they’re now an engineer via Claude Code? That governance conversation is happening in more organizations than you’d think.”

What Doesn’t Change

I want to be direct about this, because I think there’s a real risk of CTOs either over-correcting or under-responding to this shift.

The human things, specifically the leadership things, DO NOT go away. They become more important.

Your job as a leader is to create the conditions where higher-level thinking can actually happen, which means protecting your best people from being buried in review queues of AI-generated code.

Knowing which problem to solve, and why now, is still yours. AI can accelerate execution with extraordinary speed. It cannot set direction. Strategic judgment, customer empathy, navigating organizational ambiguity, building a team that trusts each other. None of that is on the automation roadmap.

What is changing is the ratio. More of the execution layer is being handled by agents, which means the humans in the loop need to be operating at a higher level not just reviewing code, but shaping outcomes. The exceptional engineers on your team will thrive in this environment. Those who relied primarily on execution throughput will find the transition harder.

The bottleneck in agentic SDLC isn’t development throughput – it’s decision quality. The humans in the loop need to be excellent at judgment, not just execution.

Questions to Sit With

If you’re a CTO thinking through what this means for your organization, these are the questions I’d encourage you to work through:

Does your development process still have handoffs that exist because of human throughput constraints rather than because the handoff itself adds value?
Where is your human review layer, and is it optimized for catching agent failure modes rather than traditional human ones?
Are your engineers spending more time on judgment, direction, and evaluation… or are they still primarily in execution mode?
How are you communicating the implications of agentic development to your CEO and board, and are you bringing them along before the organizational changes become visible?
What does “done” mean in your current process, and does that definition still hold in an environment where iteration is nearly free?

A Final Thought

The CTOs who navigate this transition well aren’t the ones who adopt every new tool fastest. They’re the ones who understand what the tools change about process, about team structure, about where human judgment is irreplaceable and redesign their organizations around that understanding.

That’s not a tooling or process problem. It’s a leadership problem.

Ready to talk about CTO coaching with Leigh?

Book a 30-minute introductory call to explore whether coaching is right for you.

Book a meeting with Leigh →

Leigh Newsome

Partner, Hoola Hoop · CTO Coach

Leigh Newsome is a Partner at Hoola Hoop and a CTO coach with 25 years of experience scaling product and engineering teams. He has worked with a wide range of startups and global enterprises, including Avid, Digidesign, WPP, and Kantar/Millward Brown, and successfully led TargetSpot (backed by Union Square Ventures, Bain Capital Ventures, and CBS) through its acquisition to Radionomy Group (Vivendi). When he’s not coaching CTOs, you’ll find him teaching digital audio to graduate students at NYU, building audio and signal processing applications, or flying fixed-wing aircraft — but never all three at once.

Courage to Lead: Courageous Systems

Courageous leadership isn’t about individual bravery — it’s about building systems where courage is distributed amongst many. This fourth and final article in the series examines how organizational systems enable or suppress courageous action, and what leaders can do to design distributed courage into the fabric of […]

CEO Coaching: Leading and Growing with Confidence

Discover how CEO coaching helps you grow into a confident and successful leader. In building and leading a company, the hardest challenge is in how you evolve as CEO. Understanding the CEO role requires courage, deeply knowing your product and your people, and navigating the terrain of markets, investors, and the unknown. It’s a struggle! […]

CTO Coaching: A Guide for Leaders

I’ve spent 25 years scaling product and engineering teams, and one thing I’ve learned is that the hardest part of being a CTO is not about technology. For most CTOs and engineering leaders I know and have worked with, it’s not technical competence that holds them back. It’s the leadership aspects of the job that […]

AI Reshaping CTO and CPO role

In 25 years of working in and around technology leadership, I’ve watched a lot of shifts and coached many CTOs and CPOs. But how AI is changing the CTO and CPO role feels different from anything I’ve seen before. It’s not just in how software gets built, but in what it means to lead a […]

Courage to Lead: Courageous Role-taking

Courageous leaders don’t just accept a job description — they shape the role they inhabit, including the risk they are willing and able to hold. This article explores the “Role” dimension of the PRS framework: how leaders navigate role given and role taken, manage fear and uncertainty, […]

Courage to Lead: The Person

Leading with courage begins with the self. This article explores the “Person” dimension of the Person–Role–System framework — examining how leaders build courage through self-knowledge, managing information overload, strengthening their mindset, and practicing presence. What is personal courage? Aside from “bravery” and the like, personal courage requires […]

Courage To Lead: An Introduction

Psychological courage is not optional — it is the foundation of effective leadership. This opening article introduces the Person–Role–System framework and examines how fear and noise undermine leadership judgment, and how courageous leadership can be deliberately cultivated as a skill. Finding your voice in a noisy world […]

A Complete Guide to Navigating Organizational Roles

The Person-Role-System framework, developed by organizational psychology experts James Krantz and Marc Maltz in 1997, provides a comprehensive approach to understanding how individuals navigate organizational roles. This systems-psychodynamics model reveals the intricate relationship between personal identity, role expectations, and organizational systems. Understanding the Person-Role-System Model for Effective Leadership, Management and Coaching What is the Person-Role-System […]

Podcast: Optimizing Tech Teams & Strategy In EdTech

In this executive leadership episode of EdTech Elevated, Lisa March, President and Founder of Partner in Publishing, interviews Leigh Newsome, Partner at Hoola Hoop and New York University adjunct professor. This episode focuses on scaling EdTech companies through navigating the complexities of technology leadership. Drawing from his experience as both a Silicon Valley engineering leader […]

What does a CEO do?

As executive coaches to CEOs, C-suites and boards, we see a lot of approaches to the role of the CEO. Some are successful and many are not. So what does a CEO do? CEO Priorities and Key Responsibilities Let’s start with the most important things CEOs need to be thinking about: Emotional Intelligence (EI) […]

Beyond the Code: Executive Coaching for CTOs and CPOs

Chief Technology Officers (CTOs) and Chief Product Officers (CPOs) navigate the complex intersection of technology, product strategy, people leadership and business objectives. At Hoola Hoop, we offer specialized executive coaching tailored to the unique challenges faced by these tech leaders. Let’s start by dispelling some common myths about CTO and CPO coaching. Common Myths About […]

How To Manage Your Board

Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) must navigate the complex relationships with their Board of Directors with acumen and dexterity. At Hoola Hoop, we provide executive coaching from former CEOs, C-suite executives and experienced Board members to help you successfully develop and manage your board. Let’s start by dispelling some common myths about board management. Common Myths […]

Executive Team Development

At Hoola Hoop, CEO coaching is considered part of the executive team’s development. CEOs do not operate alone, they engage and, in many ways, are dependent on the broader team. Team development focuses on the following: Enhanced Strategic Thinking It is critical to equip your executives with advanced problem-solving skills and a forward-thinking mindset […]

Product and Technology Due Diligence

In mergers, acquisitions, and investment decisions, comprehensive product and tech due diligence is crucial for informed decision-making and risk mitigation. This strategic evaluation process examines critical areas including technical debt assessment, architectural decisions, R&D investment analysis, and team capabilities evaluation. Beyond surface-level code review, it provides deep insights into a company’s technological sustainability, product validation, […]

Running Effective Board Meetings

Running an effective board meeting is one of the CEO’s key responsibilities. When well-conducted, these meetings are informative, insightful, and impactful, benefiting the organization by harnessing the diverse experiences and perspectives of the board team. In reality, many CEOs find board meetings burdensome to prepare for—a duty to fulfill, an obstacle to overcome. This often […]

The Essential Pillars of CTO Leadership: A Strategic Guide

As a Chief Technology Officer (CTO) in today’s dynamic tech landscape, mastering the core responsibilities of technology leadership is crucial for organizational success. Through years of CTO coaching and technology leadership experience at Hoola Hoop, we’ve identified four fundamental pillars that determine a technology executive’s effectiveness and impact. Whether you’re a new CTO or a […]

Motivation, Meaning and Resilience

Purpose, motivation, and resilience are essential for an organization to sustain success. These client case studies focus on what happens when an organization faces significant challenges due to trauma, M&A, market conditions, etc. All show a lack of clear purpose and confused organizational responses to change. We emphasize the importance of leadership in fostering a […]

Framework For Roles

Role is a complex key component of all organizations. We offer a framework for defining the way one works-in-role: their specific assigned duties, part in the overall mission, unconscious function, and the way they understand and work within an organization’s systems of tasks and sentience.

Succession Planning

Discover comprehensive insights into succession planning best practices through our analysis of 14 leading companies across multiple industries. This in-depth study examines the choices companies face when creating or improving their succession planning and management systems. It identifies several themes, including the role of human resources, the criteria for identifying high potential candidates, the relationship […]

Performance Management

Today’s performance management systems need a more effective approach that aligns with modern workforce requirements, emphasizing the importance of specific, in-the-moment feedback. One of today’s most valuable workplace assets is actionable, in-the-moment feedback, which is too often buried, lost or just not delivered in today’s ineffective performance management systems. Traditional performance management systems are out-of-sync […]

Complexity of Leadership

In complex organizations, leaders face multidimensional psychological challenges. Using the case of Arthur Andersen, a company that failed due to leadership’s inability to respond to the powerful dynamics of authorization, we discuss the importance of adaptive leadership, psychodynamic organization theory and Interpersonal psychoanalysis to understand the complexities leaders face. Successful leadership requires transparency, emotional competence, […]

Finding You in Me

The 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center devastated this investment bank. We discuss our work in helping Sandler O’Neill & Partners’ remaining managing director, employees and families, recover from the trauma of losing 39% of their friends and colleagues. We present the challenges and successes of bringing together survivors, families, volunteers and new employees […]

Thinking, Leadership and Action

Through a case study of a senior executive at a foreign bank, we look at the complex dynamics between leadership, teamwork and organizational culture, and how to help leaders navigate the challenges of a rapidly changing business landscape. We address the importance of understanding the psychological factors that drive individual and organizational behavior and decision-making; […]

Psychological Containment

Leaders must be able to identify and manage workplace stresses and anxieties, what we call “troubling, frightening bits” or TFBs, that originate from employees, work, organizational dysfunction, and external events. If unaddressed, TFBs can negatively impact an organization. “Psychological containment” is the ability to keep TFBs within limits, enabling teams to stay focused and aligned […]

The Agentic SDLC: A CTO’s Guide